Uncommon Dissent

Monday, October 31, 2005

“The Great Debate” — Scott & Trefil vs. Sisson & Dembski vs. Dembski (0 comments)

“Should public schools teach Intelligent Design along with Evolution?”



Dembski for the affirmative.
"Teach the controversy! Students are being exposed to just one side of a healthy scientific debate! Darwinism is a religion! Talking points! Quote mining!"

Dembski for the negative.
"What would be the point? I've already stated that ID can effectively subsume all the scientific results of evolution, so it's obviously got nothing to add to the discussion, except for some sort of metaphysical baggage about God, er, the Designer, er, the Designer or Designers. Besides, ID isn't a full-fledged research program yet."

Dembski.
"Damn, I'm good."



Filed under: Yes, No, Maybe So

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home